Friday, July 04, 2008

I am shocked again!

Political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda's private investigator P. Balasubramaniam on Friday retracted his statutory declaration which he made less than 24 hours ago.
More at The Star

Ask the pharmacist
1) ops...did my prayer work? i didnt pray also... did u pray?
2) Wah Lau!!!! Like that also can? Can play play with "sumpah"?

Once a master said : There are no accidents!

Thursday, July 03, 2008

i am shocked!

i am shocked...really shocked, by this morning news. I can't believe this!!

From the Office of Anwar Ibrahim: Press Statement - for immediate release

3 July 2008, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

Today we witness another episode of a consistent pattern of abuse of power and manipulation of the criminal justice system.
Recently one of the witnesses in the Altantuya trial approached us with detailed information of events connected to her disappearance and murder. The information was shocking.

Mr. P. Balasubramaniam, who was engaged by Abdul Razak Baginda as a private investigator was advised to seek legal counsel and document his story independently.

Today he is releasing a statutory declaration dated 1st July 2008 to the public detailing the story that he has to tell about what actually happened and what was told to him by key personalities in this saga including Abdul Razak Baginda and Altantuya herself.
These revelations speak for themselves. They reveal, amongst others, the following allegations:

1.Mr. Balasubramaniam was engaged by Abdul Razak Baginda to deal with alleged harassment by Altantuya in relation to debts owed to her (Paragraph 5 and 6).

2.Altantuya was promised a commission of USD 500,000 for assisting in a submarine deal in Paris (Paragraph 22, Paragraph 25.5 and Paragraph 28.2 and 28.3 ).

3.Altantuya was introduced to Razak Baginda by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore ( Paragraph 25.5 and Paragraph 28.1).

4.Altantuya, Datuk Seri Najib and Razak Baginda had all been seen together at a dinner in Paris (Paragraph 28.2).

5.After the disappearance of Altantuya, a commotion took place in front of Razak Baginda’s house several days after 20 December 2006 where girl friends of Altantuya and one Mr.Ang (Altantuya’s own private investigator) arrived searching for Altantuya. Balasubramaniam had to call the police. A patrol car arrived shortly. Shortly thereafter an investigating officer from Dang Wangi Police Station who was handling the missing persons report lodged by one of Altantuya’s girl friends arrived. Balasubramaniam then informed Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. Razak then called one DSP Musa Safri who called him back informing him that Musa would be calling him on his handphone and that he was to pass the phone to the inspector from Dang Wangi Police station. Balasubramaniam then received the call from Musa Safri and duly passed the phone to the inspector. After the conversation of 3 - 4 minutes, the inspector told the girls to disperse and to see him the next day (Paragraphs 34 - 38). We believe DSP Musa Safri was aide-de-camp to Datuk Seri Najib at the material time.

6.Balasubramaniam was interrogated at Bukit Aman for seven consecutive days and his statement recorded at the end of November 2006. He says that he told the police all that he knew including everything Razak Baginda and Altantuya had told him about their relationships with Najib. These details were omitted from the statement he was asked to sign (Paragraph 49).

7.During the trial of Sirul, Azilah and Razak Baginda at at the Shah Alam High Court, the prosecutor did not ask him any questions in respect of the relationship Altantuya had with Datuk Seri Najib or of the phone call that he had received form DSP Musa Safri (Paragraph 50).

8.When Razak Baginda was arrested, Balasubramaniam was told by him that he had sent an SMS messsage to Najib the evening before (Paragraph 51). Razak also informed Balasubramaniam that he had received an SMS from Najib and showed it to him; the message read “I am seeing IGP at 11 A.M. today …. matter will be solved … be cool”.
Mr. Balasubramaniam’s evidence also mentions the extent of the relationship between Altantuya and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak. We are not interested in the personal nature of the relationship. That is entirely his own business and hers.
However the allegations revealed by him raise key questions of public interest:
a)Suppression of evidence by the police investigating officers and those responsible for prosecuting this case. Such suppression could only have happened with the full knowledge of top public officials such as the IGP and the AG.
b)The question is also raised as to whether such suppression of evidence was the reason behind the last minute switch in DPP’s handling the case - where the head of the Criminal Division of the AG’s Chambers, Datuk Yusuf Zainal Abiden was completely sidelined from the case leading him and the senior DPP originally slotted for the case Sallehudin Saidin to put in papers for early retirement some months later.
c)Questions can be raised now with regard to the sudden switching of the judge fixed to hear the case which took place in March 2007 - why was this really done?
d) Did Datuk Seri Najib lie when he said that he had never met Altantuya before?
e) Did Datuk Seri Najib lie when he said that he was not involved in any commission deals for the purchases of the Scorpene submarines”

Mr.Balasubramaniam’s evidence vindicate what we have been saying all along; there has been no proper investigation of the murder of Altantuya and the investigation and proceedings in court seem to following a pre-arranged script for a pre-arranged outcome.

This has serious implications for the administration of justice in the country where the integrity and credibility of our key institutions such as the police, the AG’s chambers and the judiciary are already severely tarnished.
Today’s revelations further confirm a clear and consistent pattern of manipulation of the criminal justice system that we have witnessed in this country since 1998.

The allegations revealed here warrant a full Royal Commission of Inquiry.

ANWAR IBRAHIM

— Statutory Declaration by Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal —

[ PDF Version ]

News from The Star
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ask the pharmacist
1) Do u believe this? If it is real, wat has happened to our country? Maybe i should pray more for my country. Start praying...Dont know how? Refer to WikiHow

Wednesday, July 02, 2008

The most important equipment in a retail pharmacy

A CALCULATOR OF COURSE.
A good calculator is very important in helping a pharmacist to run his biz.
Most important criteria: It will give accurate answers.

Of all these calculators here, which one i prefer?

Model 1 : Canon LC-210Hi
Pros: Portable
Cons: Too small for my fingers, not very useful, display screen small

Model 2: Unbranded
Pros: Looks attractive, FOC courtesy of Roche
Cons: Buttons at wierd position, calculator slipping away when pressed

Model 3: Casio fx-570s
Pros: Good for complex calculation
Cons: But not suitable for biz ..haha

Model 4: Unbranded
Pros: FOC (courtesy of Boehringer)
Cons: The display screen is reflective to light, button not responsive enough.

Model 5: Canon TX-1210Hi II
Pros: Big screen
Cons: Expensive, space consuming

Model: Canon LS-88Hi II
The winner:
Pros: Reliable, non-slippery, cheap, can use solar and normal battery, correct positioning of buttons, extra large + button, auto off.

Ask the pharmacist
1) Since all the calculators here depends on electronic circuit, it can fail anytime without warning.
So, what do i do? I use this . MUAHAHAHA!Big winner:
Pros: Reliable (this abacus is older than me), does not depends on battery, can use as a weapon, accuracy depends on users (can be very accurate or very inaccurate), it can give any answer that u want...ops.

Tuesday, July 01, 2008

Worms in banana

I have just eaten a piece of banana full with small worms. Aiks..

My first buying from Amazon.com

This is the book i always wanted when i was a student. I fall in love with it when i visited Kamal Bookstore near HKL, where i was attached to b4. But since it cost more about RM 250, heck,as a student, where do i find the money to buy?

But now it is different situation, even i don't have the money, i can always pay with my credit card.
So, I visited Amazon.com after a good recommendation from THE GREAT TED and finally bought the book on June 17, with standard shipping. After i checkout, i received an email from Amazon.

Subtotal: US 58.50+ std delivery US 9.98= US 68.48
Items shipped on June 17, 2008:
Delivery estimate: July 24, 2008

Huh, July 24? Wah..38 days b4 i can see my love. Yup, i love my books.

But today i was surprised to received this. It just took them 14 days !! WOOOHOOO!!!!
My book has arrived from Amazon.com in superb condition. Nice packing, fast delivery.
Will i buy from Amazon again? Of course. 100% recommended.

Ask the pharmacist

1) Continuing pharmacy education is important.
2) Pharmacy profession is also life long learning professions.
3) It will take me some time to digest the contents, 662 pages wor...